The Joke Is the Knife: Why Funny Is the Hardest Way to Kill Someone

David Cosgrove

There’s a polite assumption in crime fiction that humor is garnish. The body is the meal. The detective’s one-liner is the parsley: a little color on the plate, a break in the grimness, comic relief, as if the laughter exists to let pressure out of the book. I’d like to formally object.
Home » Articles » The Joke Is the Knife: Why Funny Is the Hardest Way to Kill Someone

I want to be upfront about something: I have killed countless people.

On paper.

Mostly in Los Angeles, which will surprise no one who has driven in Los Angeles.

I killed them with cars, with guns, with RPGs, with poor decisions compounding at interest, and, in one case I remain proud of, with a chain of events so stupid that the coroner’s report should have been filed under comedy.

Because that’s the genre I work in.

Comic crime.

The neighborhood of the bookstore where they keep Carl Hiaasen, Donald Westlake, and Elmore Leonard, and where the staff recommendation cards all say some version of “you’ll feel bad for laughing.”

That card is the whole genre.

Let me explain.

The Garnish Theory of Comedy

There’s a polite assumption in crime fiction that humor is garnish. The body is the meal. The detective’s one-liner is the parsley: a little color on the plate, a break in the grimness, comic relief, as if the laughter exists to let pressure out of the book.

I’d like to formally object.

In the comic crime novel, the joke isn’t relief from the darkness. The joke is the delivery mechanism for the darkness.

It’s not the parsley.

It’s the knife.

Here is how it works, mechanically, and I apologize in advance for explaining a magic trick.

A reader who is braced for horror is a reader with their guard up. They’ve seen the cover. They know a body’s coming. They read the dark scene through their fingers at a safe emotional distance, protected by the genre’s own warning label.

But a reader who is laughing has no guard at all.

The human nervous system has no clean procedure for giggling and recoiling at the same time. Ask it to do both and it simply picks the giggle and hopes for the best.

So the comic crime writer gets you giggling at a man’s catastrophic life choices, keeps you giggling right up to the doorframe, and then walks you through the doorway and into the room where the consequences live.

You arrive at the terrible thing undefended.

That’s why the violence in Hiaasen stings like hell while the violence in a thousand grimmer, more serious thrillers slides right off. You never saw it coming because you were too busy laughing.

The Trap Closes

There’s a second mechanism, and it’s the one that convinces me comic crime is secretly the most moral corner of the genre.

When a straight thriller shows you an atrocity, you get to feel appropriately somber about it.

Very dignified.

Everyone behaves well.

When a comic crime novel shows you an atrocity, you laugh. Then, one beat later, you catch yourself laughing, and now the book has you exactly where it wants you.

You’re not observing the moral problem anymore.

You’re implicated in it.

Westlake did this with Dortmunder, whose heists fail so beautifully that you root for the crime.

I have rooted for the crime. I’m not proud of it.

I’m not not proud of it.

Leonard did it by making even his fools and killers so fully human that, when one dies, it can feel like losing a terrible friend.

Don Winslow works a harsher variation in the Cartel trilogy: flashes of wit and human warmth get you close enough to the characters that, when the books turn horrific, there is nowhere safe to stand.

The joke is gone by then.

The access it created remains.

Vonnegut, patron saint of the whole operation, did it with three words:

So it goes.

A shrug so vast it circles all the way back around to grief.

That’s a trick solemn crime fiction has to sweat much harder to pull. Solemnity keeps the reader at a respectful distance from the bodies. Comedy marches you right up to them and asks what, exactly, you found so funny.

The High-Wire Act

Which is why this is the hardest way to do it.

Tone in comic crime is a knife-juggling act, and the margins are cruel. One joke too broad and the corpse becomes a cartoon: nothing at stake, nothing lost, a Wile E. Coyote crater.

One joke too few and you’ve written a regular thriller with some banter in it, which is a fine thing to write but is not the thing.

The comic crime writer has to hold two truths at once for four hundred pages:

This is genuinely funny.

This genuinely matters.

Neither one is allowed to cancel the other.

Most writers, sensibly, decline.

It’s easier to be dark.

Darkness has no timing.

Put the Theory in a Blue Tie

The trouble with having a theory is that eventually you have to put it in a suit and see whether it survives.

Mine is named Marv Slocum: forty-seven years old, out of Van Nuys, rumpled in a way that suggests his suit lost a fight, and carrying the general aura of a man for whom things have already gone wrong and are merely deciding how.

Marv is not a comedy character dropped into a crime novel.

Marv is what the mechanism looks like when it wears a blue tie.

You laugh at him. You can’t help it. And the laughter walks you straight into the rooms I need you to enter with your guard down.

Marv first turned up in The Meridian Job. In No Clean Hands, Kirkus called it “delightfully funny, playful, and bloody,” a phrase I’ve considered having engraved somewhere because it’s the entire argument of this article performed in five words.

Funny and playful: load-bearing walls.

Bloody: the room they’re holding up.

And in Rock Bottom Express, the follow-up, I did the only responsible thing and made it incalculably worse.

If No Clean Hands was the mechanism working as designed, Rock Bottom Express is the stress test.

The cover shows a vast canyon. And far down at the bottom of it, in the distance, a fire is raging. Not a campfire. Not an accident anyone is coming to put out. An inferno, chewing through the dark at the bottom of the world, with nothing in the frame to tell you what’s burning, or who lit it, or whether whoever lit it considers the job finished.

You can assume that part is not funny.

That’s the true diagram of the book. The comedy is the long walk down.

The fire is what the comedy was walking you toward the whole time.

The Staff Recommendation Card, Revisited

So the next time a bookseller’s card warns, “You’ll feel bad for laughing,” take the book.

That bad feeling is the genre operating to spec.

It’s the moment the comedy stops being garnish and turns out to have been the knife all along.

And you, laughing, holding it.

That moment — the laugh, then the catch, then the weight — is the only thing I’m ever actually writing toward.

Everything else is weather.